2017 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2017 Hyundai Tucson
Have you always wanted to get behind the wheel of an SUV but were worried about the reputations these vehicles have built over the years for being gas-guzzling beasts that hogged your entire driveway? While that may be true of some sport utility vehicles of days gone by, these days that old stereotype doesn’t hold much water. Engineering has gotten so advanced over the last decade or so that SUVs can be both powerful and efficient, especially with the rise of the crossover. A crossover is sort of a way to have your cake and eat it too by enjoying the power and cargo space of an SUV with the efficiency and maneuverability of a traditional sedan or coupe. You do not have to settle for one or the other. The market is saturated with these automobiles today, so it may be difficult to find which one is best for you. We’re here to help with a comparison of the 2017 Mitsubishi Outlander vs the 2017 Hyundai Tucson.
|2017 Mitsubishi Outlander||vs||2017 Hyundai Tucson|
|166 HP||Horsepower||164 HP|
|25/30 City/Hwy MPG||Fuel Economy||23/30 City/Hwy MPG|
|63.3 Cubic Feet||Maximum Cargo Capacity||61.9 Cubic Feet|
|7 People||Seating Capacity||5 People|
2017 Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower and fuel economy
Can an SUV be powerful and efficient? The 2017 Mitsubishi Outlander answers that question with its potent 166-horsepower engine and its estimated 25 city and 30 highway miles per gallon. The 2017 Hyundai Tucson falls shy of the Outlander in terms of horsepower, with its 164-horsepower engine, and can’t quite match the city efficiency of the Outlander either, getting an estimated 23 city miles per gallon. Power and efficiency—those are two main specifications that are important for any vehicle, not just SUVs. But SUVs in particular are also about seating and cargo capacity. The 2017 Mitsubishi Outlander can seat as many as seven people, whereas the 2017 Hyundai Tucson has seating for just five people. When you fold the rear seats down, the Outlander opens up to 63.3 cubic feet of cargo space, while the Tucson falls short of that with 61.9 cubic feet. Those of you who have been on long camping weekends or big trips to the grocery store know how important it is to have every inch of space you can, so a little difference goes a long way.
The numbers speak for themselves. The 2017 Outlander beats the Tucson in four important categories, making it a remarkable vehicle for anyone who wants to experience the versatility SUVs are known for.